<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Write To Write &#187; letters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writetowrite.com/tag/letters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writetowrite.com</link>
	<description>A writing journal from a fledgeling author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>A quick negative from an agent is best</title>
		<link>http://writetowrite.com/literary-agent-quick-negative-best/</link>
		<comments>http://writetowrite.com/literary-agent-quick-negative-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 10:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetowrite.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick update on progress&#8230;
I mentioned recently about switching tactics and approaching literary agents with an initial query letter rather than a package of letter, synopsis, and sample chapters (based on each agent&#8217;s preference). 
Some agents make it known that they will respond within a few days, to query letters. My experience so far has been just that. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>A quick update on progress&#8230;</h3>
<p>I mentioned recently about switching tactics and approaching literary agents with an initial query letter rather than a package of letter, synopsis, and sample chapters (based on each agent&#8217;s preference). </p>
<p>Some agents make it known that they will respond within a few days, to query letters. My experience so far has been just that. Two approaches (both returning negative), promoted responses within 72 hours. The first wanted to explore the idea a little further, while the other responded promptly with a pass.</p>
<p>Compare this to the 6-8 weeks of waiting for a response when sending a full package. </p>
<h2>Is a query letter enough?</h2>
<p>I do not know any literary agents personally, and can only go by advice I have received from reputable sources, but it seems to me that if I am unable to hook someone in with a brief summary of the work, there&#8217;s no way they are going to spend even more time reading an mss.</p>
<p>For now, query letters &#8211; which are tough to write, I have to say &#8211; will be the way forward unless a particular agent explicitly requests more.</p>
<p>Perhaps if you really do have the next Pulitzer Prize novel, then a query letter might not do the piece justice. But really, as a writer, if I cannot write a letter that grabs an agent&#8217;s interest about a project within which lies my future, then I need to give up and go sweep the roads.</p>
<img src="http://writetowrite.com/c11e609a/266bbf51/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://writetowrite.com/literary-agent-quick-negative-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
